Woodcote (Epsom) Residents’ Society response to Guild Living revised proposals for Epsom Hospital Site

Guild Living has recently consulted residents on its revised plans for a Residential Care Community at Epsom Hospital following rejection of the earlier application 19/01722/FUL.

A webinar promoted by Guild Living took place on 13 Jan 2021 and the overwhelmingly (100%) negative comments at the webinar indicated that residents consider the proposed changes to fall far short to overcome the grounds for rejection of the first scheme which included:

  1. The proposed development by reason of its height, mass, scale and design would adversely impact and harm the character and appearance of the area (including the built environment and landscape setting).
  2. The siting of the development leaves insufficient landscaping opportunities to the frontage of Woodcote Green Road and along the south-western boundary with neighbouring residential property to mitigate the impact of the proposed development, presenting an overdeveloped and hard edge to the appearance to the development, which would cause harm to the character and appearance of the area.
  3. The proposed development by reason of its height, massing and design would adversely impact on the neighbouring amenities of the occupiers at 40 and 46 Woodcote Green Road, by means of overbearing, loss of privacy and loss of outlook.

None of these are considered to have been satisfactorily addressed in the revised proposals as put forward in the Webinar. Changes are considered to be marginal and do not significantly change the harmful effect of the overbearing height, mass, scale and design of the proposed development.

Comparing roof heights (without roof plant), the revised proposals still show a significant increase in height over existing heights. The roof line of the extensive and massive 8-storey main Blocks that are now proposed in place of the previous 9 storey Blocks would still be 6.35m higher than that of the existing Wells hospital building.

The 2m depth of landscaping alongside 40 Woodcote Green Road flank boundary is considered wholly inadequate to screen and separate the adjacent residents from visitor parking, noise, disturbance and fumes. These residents would also still be overlooked from the proposed upper floor flat windows within the Block proposed on the site of the existing Woodcote Lodge building.

Woodcote (Epsom) Residents’ Society considers that a further 2 floor levels should be omitted from the main 8-storey Blocks, equalising them with the maximum height of the Wells Building at 6 storeys. Similarly, 1 floor level should be omitted from the 4 storey Block now proposed adjacent to 40 Woodcote Green Road as when allowance is made for roof plant it would still be nearly 8m higher than the adjacent 2 storey housing.  Additional landscaping is also required to offset the development from the residential boundary.

There are also outstanding resident concerns regarding inadequate parking provision and traffic generation. For example, the number of parking spaces, reduced in number under the proposed revisions, is considered likely to result in overspill parking.

We have raised all these matters with the Council’s planning officers and have requested that in their pre-application discussions with the developer that they require further amendments to any future planning application submitted to address the outstanding concerns of the local community highlighted in the webinar.

NB: Produced by the WERS planning sub-committee

Posted in News, Planning | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Woodcote (Epsom) Residents’ Society response to Guild Living revised proposals for Epsom Hospital Site

Annual General Meeting (AGM) – 3rd March 8pm

Our Annual General Meeting (AGM) this year will be held via a Zoom meeting on Wednesday 8th March 2021 from 8pm.

Agenda, minutes and meeting details to be posted onto the website and social media.


Processing…
Success! You're on the list.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Annual General Meeting (AGM) – 3rd March 8pm

COVID- 19 community vacination programme for Surrey

#

22 December 2020

Dear Stakeholder,

Covid-19 community vaccination programme for Surrey

Surrey Heartlands CCG have been receiving lots of enquiries from the public regarding the Covid-19 vaccination programme in Surrey.

The Frequently Asked Questions are being updated regularly and can be found here. Please share these FAQ’s with your network.

Please encourage local people not to contact the NHS to seek a Covid-19 vaccine appointment, and reassure them they will be contacted when an appointment is available. We would ask you to encourage local people to help the NHS by being patient.

When people are contacted, they are urged to attend their booked appointment. Please also remind people that both doses of the vaccine are needed for it to be effective (which is about 7 days after the second dose).

Your help with sharing these key messages is much appreciated.

Finally, we would remind everyone to please continue to follow all the latest guidance to control the virus and save lives.

Thank you for your continued support.

Posted in News | Comments Off on COVID- 19 community vacination programme for Surrey

SCC plans for a Single Unitary Council for Surrey – Update

Many residents will already know of Surrey County Councils (SCC) plans to abolish all of Surrey’s borough and district councils and create a Single Unitary Council providing all services for Surrey’s 1.2 million residents.

The plan was hatched in secret, with SCC’s leaders talking to the Government and Surrey’s Conservative MPs, and it was only made known when it was revealed in an article in the press.  However, whilst the Government had signalled its intentions to review local government, SCC was in fact trying to get ahead of any actual announcement of their future plans.

As it was, the Government itself told SCC that it was premature, but not before the leaders of SCC had spent a huge amount of council taxpayers’ money on consultants, leafleting, market research and lobbying.  

At the SCC Council Meeting in October, Residents’ Association County Councillors put down a Motion calling for the Conservative Leader of SCC to publish the cost of his plans to date. 

Instead of debating the motion, the Conservatives ordered their county councillors not to speak and, after only two speeches a vote was taken and the motion calling for details of the costs to be made public was defeated by 52 votes to 21.

Despite this refusal to be open, various requests for financial information show that so far SCC has spent over £¼ million on the project.

Across Surrey there is real concern about SCC’s attempt create a unitary council and thereby seize the powers and the financial and property assets of boroughs and districts. 

A new group called #Residents Against Surrey Single Unitary had been set up to challenge the plans and you can find out more about the group and SCC’s plans at www.RASSU.org.uk

The RASSU website also allows you to sign a petition against SCC’s plans for a unitary council.

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on SCC plans for a Single Unitary Council for Surrey – Update

Queues to access Recycling Centre not SCC’s fault?

In an extraordinary claim, two Epsom based Conservative Surrey County Councillors stated in a political leaflet distributed to residents in November that the long queues to access SCC’s Community Recycling Centre were not the fault of SCC at all but of Epsom and Ewell Borough Council’s weekly recycling service and the Borough’s residents who were not filling up their bins, but taking material to the CRC!

The fact that they have shut the CRC for two days of the week, Tuesday and Wednesday and Epsom and Ewell residents recycle a great deal at home and use the CRC for bulky waste, white goods, DIY material and excess green waste, for example, seems to have been lost on them.

However, it is sad to see such an extraordinary comment issued as fact, and makes you wonder what else in their leaflets need checking!

Posted in News | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Queues to access Recycling Centre not SCC’s fault?

Councillor McCormick wins award for Services to local community

At the recent Local Government Association (LGA) Group conference and AGM 2020 Councillor Steven McCormick was awarded a citation for Services to local community.

This was in recognition of his efforts in combating littering on the Epsom Downs during the first lockdown period and the anti-social behaviour in using nitrous oxide (NO2) canisters.

“I was very pleased to receive the citation and my thanks to my peers, colleagues and friends for the recommendation and the support.” – Councillor McCormick

Councillor Steven McCormick – Services to local community

https://www.local.gov.uk/sites/default/files/documents/Citations%20presentation%20-Independent%20group.pdf

Posted in News | Tagged | Comments Off on Councillor McCormick wins award for Services to local community

Mums for Lungs – Can you help?

Can you help us with two actions to clean up our air?
 

  1. Email your MP. Ask them to support legally binding commitments to meet WHO air pollution standards by 2030 in the Environment Bill.

    The British Lung Foundation’s campaign for cleaner air makes this easy to do. Please ask your friends, family and colleagues (especially if they have a Conservative MP) to do the same.

     
  2. Get vocal. Let the Transport Secretary know you support measures that encourage people to walk, cycle and scoot.

    Email Grant Shapps (TransportSecretary@dft.gsi.gov.uk), your local MP and councillors (you can use writetothem.com) with your support for the changes you are seeing that promote walking and cycling such as School Streets and new cycle lanes. 
     

Five minutes of your time helps keep much needed pressure on our politicians to act on air pollution.

Thank you!

Mums for Lungs

Posted in News | Tagged , | Comments Off on Mums for Lungs – Can you help?

Government is going to review housing targets for Surrey

Recent tweet from Eber Kington
Posted in News, Planning | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on Government is going to review housing targets for Surrey

Cllr Liz Frost – update – 29/10/2020

I am contacting you now with some updates and to let you know that, unfortunately there has been a rise in Covid-19 in the borough.

A recent press release, urging residents to be vigilant, reports –

‘Epsom & Ewell Borough Council is urging residents to increase their efforts to slow the spread of coronavirus as public health data shows that the number of positive cases in the borough has significantly risen

Infection rates are rising steeply in Epsom and Ewell and the council is calling on people of all ages to do all they can to restrict the spread of coronavirus.

Data published by the county council shows that, for the week ending 24 October, the Epsom and Ewell rate was 109 cases for every 100,000 people. This is significantly higher than the majority of Surrey.’

Please do continue following the basic advice of hands, face, space and the rule of six. Individual actions can help to stabilise, then reduce, the transmission of the virus and protect the most vulnerable people in our community – it’s in our own hands to keep ourselves and our loved ones, neighbors, staff and customers safe.   This includes making and keeping healthcare appointments where required.

Following the easing of the earlier lockdown, the Borough Council has worked hard to re-introduce services in line with Covid-19 safe guidance.  It may be that there need to be further changes in view of the rise in cases in the area.  You can keep up to date by looking on the website (www.epsom-ewell.gov.uk/coronavirus). 

Surrey County Council has also brought many services back, with libraries and the Tip now open – although with reduced hours.  If you want to use the Epsom Community Recycling Centre (The Tip), from 5th November you will need to pre-book a slot.  Please see https://www.surreycc.gov.uk/waste-and-recycling/community-recycling-centres/epsom for more information.

Following the initial pause in Council and Committee meetings at the start of lockdown, there have been some changes to dates to reflect changes to work programmes.  However remote meetings are now taking place routinely.  Anyone can log on phone in to listen – the details are in the committee papers on the website.  An advantage of this is that more residents have taken advantage of this than had previously come to the Town Hall and watched from the public gallery.

As with so many organisations, the Council is facing huge financial challenges.  Additional costs continue to be incurred as a direct result of the pandemic.  These include the costs of providing essential services for vulnerable residents; increased need for temporary accommodation; support, guidance and advice for businesses and other local organisations; additional IT costs and training for new ways of working; additional communications.  At the same time the Council’s income has dropped with initial suspension of parking charges; ongoing reduced use of car parks, hire of venues, uptake of paid for services; and more people unable to pay Council tax etc.  There have been some financial contributions from Central Government, but they do not cover the extra expenses incurred.

I am pleased that the amount of litter on the Downs has reduced.  It is still disappointing to find the remains of take-aways, bottles, cans etc – but there is certainly less than during the early stages of lock-down.  If you are going to the Downs, apart from taking your litter home with you, please remember that race horse training takes place Monday to Saturday mornings till noon and on Sundays till 9.30.  Not only can racehorses be easily spooked and unpredictable, but they also do have priority during training so please keep well away from them as they go to and from the gallops.

Improving Healthcare Together (IHT), the committee formed of the Merton, Sutton and Surrey Downs Clinical Commissioning Groups completed their consultations and deliberations over the future of local hospital services.  We had argued strongly for the new critical care unit to be located at Epsom, however IHT decided in favour of Sutton.  Both Epsom and St Helier will retain most (85%) of the current services, will have a 24 hour urgent treatment centre and extensive refurbishment of the current buildings.  Although not the outcome we had hoped for, now that IHT has made their decision, we were hoping that the building work etc would take place without delay.  However, Merton Council has called the decision in on the grounds that it takes services away from an area of deprivation (St Helier).  This is now with the Health Secretary, Matt Hancock.  The chief executive of the hospital trust, Daniel Elkeles, will be giving an update to the Health Liaison Panel on Tuesday 9th November.  If you would like to listen, details can be found at https://democracy.epsom-ewell.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CommitteeId=148

There are ongoing problems with the water supply in Langley Vale.  Bernice, along with our MP and a number of residents, are trying to get the issues resolved – but there are long-standing problems and apparently it’s not a simple fix.  However, Thames Water are working alongside their power supplier and are currently awaiting information on whether UK Power Networks’ assets are affecting Thames Water’s booster station.  An update is expected by 9 November.  Thames Water has stated that it is very important that residents report problems to them as quickly as possible, whenever they occur.  Their number is 0800 0009 3965.  Bernice has also asked for two suspected water leaks in the village, which have been recently reported to her, to be investigated.

The Government is consulting on their plans for a major overhaul of the English Planning System.  There is still much uncertainty, but it is likely to impact the numbers of new homes to be built in each area; a new definition of ‘permitted development’; and the whole process of applying for and being granted planning permission.  Epsom & Ewell has responded to the consultation and has also challenged the Government’s housing target, requiring us to achieve 579 additional homes every year.  This figure is based on Office of National statistics (ONS) housing projection figures for 2014.  There have been two further ONS predictions, showing a reducing requirement.  The latest, 2018, projection show the borough only needing 215 new homes per annum.  However the Government is now changing the method of calculating housing need and including an ‘affordability’ element.  This increases our target to 604 because property prices here are above average, and it believes that increasing the number of properties sufficiently will result in bringing down the prices. 

Woodcote Ward had several major planning applications recently –

22-24 Dorking Road.  This applied to demolish 2 houses and replace them with 20 flats, spread over 5 floors, including a lower ground floor and roof accommodation, with a 15 space basement carpark.  Many residents objected mainly to the height and mass of the proposed building and the lack of parking provision.  I spoke on behalf of residents at the Planning Committee. The Committee, after fully debated the application, decided to refuse it, against the Officer recommendation.  The applicant has the right to appeal the decision with the National Inspector.

Woodcote Grove (Atkins land).  When the new Atkins headquarters building was granted planning permission in 2015, a condition was that once it was in use, the former office building would be demolished and the site landscaped.  However Atkins decided to sell part of their site for redevelopment, including the former office block, together with the Mansion House (grade 11* listed), stable block (grade 11 listed) and some other buildings.  The developer applied to convert the listed buildings to apartments and build 2 terraces of houses between them, plus a 2 storey and a large 5 storey block of apartments, giving a total of 98 properties and 90 parking spaces.  I spoke at the Planning Committee, objecting to the height and mass of the large block, lack of affordable housing, not meeting our housing mix needs, damage to our heritage asset and conservation area, lack of parking and road safety concerns.  The Officer recommendation was to approve.  After much debate, and an unsuccessful motion to refuse it, the majority of the Planning Committee voted to approve the application.  

Dorking Road / Woodcote Green Road (Epsom Hospital land).  The application for the major redevelopment of part of this site to provide about 350 units of accommodation for elderly people (some with additional ‘care’ facilities), 24 ‘key worker’ homes, together with a day nursery, shops,  restaurant, café, gym, library and other facilities (some open to non-residents), is scheduled to be heard by the Planning Committee in November.  I have received overwhelming opposition to the proposal from residents and so will speak against it at the meeting.

Langley Bottom Farm.  An application has been submitted to demolish the farm buildings and replace them with 20 properties and parking.  This is a very sensitive site and there is strong local opposition.

Dorking Road – Epsom Hospital.  The hospital trust has applied for planning permission to build a 5 level multi-storey car park with access from the Dorking road, in a similar position to the current visitors’ car park.  With a capacity of 527 spaces, it is not designed to provide increased parking but to make better use of the current fragmented parking and improve safety around the site.

Posted in Councillor Updates | Comments Off on Cllr Liz Frost – update – 29/10/2020

A community guide for responding to the White Paper

“The current planning system in England is far from perfect and many of the changes over the last ten years have undermined public trust. But now the Westminster government has published a Planning White Paper to radically reform the planning system and is inviting responses. “

“If you care about your neighbourhood it is vital that you respond to the Planning White Paper consultation. This guide aims to help people to respond whether you are responding as an individual or on behalf of an organisation. The guide does not cover all of the 26 questions posed in the White Paper but does set out some key points we hope people will consider including in their responses. As well as responding to the consultation you might also want to consider talking to your local MP. Find out how to do that here. “

Please find the full article here –

https://www.tcpa.org.uk/pages/faqs/category/community-guide

Posted in News, Planning | Comments Off on A community guide for responding to the White Paper